The Lehmann
Letter (SM)
Households
face a balance-sheet crisis: Asset-values (especially home values) have plunged
while debt has barely shrunk, leaving households with substantially less wealth
(net worth).
Here's the
key question: How can households simultaneously repair this damage, i.e. reduce
debt, rebuild net worth and restore liquidity, while at the same time resurrecting
the borrowing and spending required to drive the recovery?
Answer: They
can't. It's impossible to save and borrow at the same time.
Here are some
key reports on the crisis.
Yesterday the
Fed released:
“Changes in U.S.
Family Finances from 2007 to 2010: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer
Finances”
It’s a long
report. These are the key sentences from its summary:
“Overall,
both median and mean net worth also fell dramatically over this period—38.8
percent and 14.7 percent, respectively. Changes in housing wealth and business
equity were key drivers in those wealth changes…..
“Debt fell more slowly than assets
over the recent three-year period. Thus, overall indebtedness as a share of
assets rose markedly. Home-secured debt fell slightly as a share of total family
debt, but in 2010 it remained by far the largest component of family debt…..”
To summarize the summary: Debt rose as
assets and wealth fell.
For a less intimidating read, see today’s
New York Times for an excellent abstract of the report:
“Family Net
Worth Drops to Level of Early ’90s, Fed Says”
On Saturday, June 9, an earlier story
in the Times – that also relied on Fed data - anticipated yesterday’s Fed
report:
“Income and Wealth Are Down in U.S.”
The article’s
second and third paragraphs said:
“Now, however, is the
first time in more than half a century that the average American is both
earning less and worth less than four years earlier, at least after inflation
is factored in.
“The
genesis of that fall was, of course, the financial crisis and the sharp decline
in the value of homes, the principal asset of most Americans, followed by the
sharp drop in stock prices. The crisis led to stubbornly high unemployment that
cut income for many Americans and made wage increases harder to obtain for
those who did hold on to their jobs.”
This time it really was
different, and destruction of balance-sheet values was the difference.
(To be fully
informed visit http://www.beyourowneconomist.com/)
© 2012
Michael B. Lehmann
No comments:
Post a Comment